Find your perfect puppy at Champdogs
The UK's leading pedigree dog breeder website for over 25 years
> We have our names down for a puppy now, and feel very comfortable with the breeder of him.
> Do you think I have been wrong in the way I have gone about looking for a puppy?
>
> My problem is that I am usually a very 'practical' kind of guy, and on this occassion I have let intuition win
> Although I agree with you about the breed clubs wire mad, I do know a lot of good breeders that have websites too. :-)
> The section on titles would need to be adapted for UK purposes
> The breeder I originally found has a website, but the very brief introduction is very misleading saying that she hip scores as this is very important to any working dog
> Unethical breeders very often have one to three males and a "harem" of females,
>
> Oh dear....thats me in trouble then!!!!!!
Unethical breeders very often have one to three males and a "harem" of females
> So even IF a breeder has a couple of males and and a couple of females that doesn't
> mean senseless, irresponsible reproduction.
Quite so but the statement you quote does not contradict that does it.
Why tease them, why not just explain to them the basic differences between your breeding and less reputable breeders that make it not a matter of convenience? It would also be another opportunity to educate them regarding the many other issues that determine the differences for example reasons why litters might be bred, the value of properly evaluated and tested stock etc.
BigEars, don't you think it's logical for people to think that, if you breed/have bred dogs then they're likely to be entire?
>>BigEars, don't you think it's logical for people to think that, if you breed/have bred dogs then they're likely to be entire?
>No. Not necessarily.
> maybe to shed a prejudice would be a good start
If he pays his cards right
:-)
How can people breed from animals which aren't entire
Fair enough but the statement we were talking about showed no prejudice. You missunderstood it. It did not say that all breeders that have both males and females are puppy farmers but that unethical breeders often do. I don't mean to be rude but that maybe puts you on shaking ground when using that to launch a complaint regarding peoples poor communication skills
> I am just puzzled by the way statements like the quoted one seem to gain unquestioned validity.
>Because the (don't quite know the right word for it) reverse valid statement could read "Ethical breeders never have a couple of males and a group of females".
>>How can people breed from animals which aren't entire
>Of course they can't. But they may have in the past ...
> if the answers are satisfactory then there isn't a problem but they need to know the questions to ask in the first place
Powered by mwForum 2.29.6 © 1999-2015 Markus Wichitill