
If the breed was meant to have this Merle colour, then it wouldnt have been a fault. This colour was always a fault, and to breed a fault on purpose? Later, it did become a disqualification.
She is claming that these Merles are pure bred miniature pinschers. This is simply not the case. She has 6 Generations of Min Pin x Rat Terrier. The last 4 generations have been bred back to the miniature pinscher. They are still a mixed breed. They havent been bred true long enough to be considered a colour on their own. Kinda like the logic, of if you breed two Labradoodles together, do you now have a pure bred labradoodle? No, you still have a designer mutt.
Also, if she wanted to preserve this colour, and breeding for the Merle Pinschers, then why is she not wanting to sell to another Miniature Pinscher breeder? Surely this would only help the breed colour?
Also, a dog shouldnt be sold for different prices, depending on colours. I do not know one Miniature Pinscher breeder, that sells black and tans for more or less than the reds. They are all the same price. The only time dogs are sold for different prices (as puppies) are when the breeders get a colour that is less desirable, and they are sold for less, not more.
There is just to much, as a min pin person, that can not be agreed with. Just my opinion though.