
Churchill was born into a socially high ranked family ergo he was not a commoner
Being a commoner & using the term correctly & not as it has been used in the 19th century onwards, has nothing to do with being royal or having a title !
Sadly the terminology started to be used incorrectly as meaning one had to have a "title"if one did not wish to be a commoner
Defintion of common people: commonality, commoners, great unwashed, huddled masses, infrastructure, masses, multitude, plebians, proletariat, rabble, rank and file, riffraff, the herd, the many, the masses, the working class, vulgus
Antonym-aristocracy
Defintion-elite, gentility, gentry, government, haute monde, high society, nobility, noblesse, patricians, patriciate, peerage, society, upper class, upper crust
One would hardly say the Churchills were ever commmoners at least not in the last 400 years or so & even today
BTW Hereditary peers were allowed to disclaim their titles, although the only peer to do so and become Prime Minister, Sir Alec Douglas-Home the 14th Earl of Home,
John Spencer-Churchill, 7th Duke of Marlborough had three sons & Randolph was the third of these
John Winston Spencer-Churchill, 7th Duke of Marlborough (1822-1883)
George Charles Spencer-Churchill, 8th Duke of Marlborough (1844-1892)
Charles Richard Spencer-Churchill, 9th Duke of Marlborough (1871-1934)
John Albert William Spencer-Churchill, 10th Duke of Marlborough (1897-1972)
John George Vanderbilt Spencer-Churchill, 11th Duke of Marlborough (b. 1926)
Heir Apparent: Charles James Spencer-Churchill, Marquess of Blandford (b. November 24, 1955)
As you will see Randolph Spencer Churchill was never the Duke of Marlborough ! so Churchill never had a peerage to give up, However he was actually The Right Honourable Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill(this is the specific wording used to convey honor to one perceived as a social superior)all his life irrespective of whether he was an MP etc Only the sons of Dukes can be called Lord(unless they are given a peerage)
Sorry to be so perdantic but hereditary peerages are something I have done a paper on in the past-it's funny how many people think that Churchill gave up a peerage to become an MP when in fact he did nothing of the sort, I think the error comes becasue ALL the sons of Dukes are called Lord ---- ------, but only one can inherit the title. Also the terminology of commoner is also incorrcetly used as meaning non royal or royal blood when in fact it means born in to a family of lower social status
The House of the Commons as it should correctly be called was originally meant to have no one of "noble"birth as a member, however as right up until the 1920's the MP's were usually from high social ranking(just not hereditary peers)& their membership was"bought"with little opposition as both Conservative & Liberal parties were both run from the upper house in all but name. In fact some constituencies always elected the son of the previous member in the same way that hereditary titles are inherited
LOL The only title he turned down was to become the Duke of London after the electoral defeat in 1945 he was however knighted in 1953