
Hi Dollface, I have thought lots and lots about this whole question. I think one of the biggest sticking points for me is that I have been serioulsy against the DDA since it was brought in. I havent been an active campaigner, but I have signed loads of petitions, written letters when asked, made donations, etc. etc. So do I have a right to throw my moral convictions to the wind just becasue it was my own dog attacked? Even putting aside the pracitical difficulties I previously mentioned of getting the boys details, etc, and my fear of reprisals, should you put aside your own strong principles just because you are the one affected? If she was killed or injured was, I think, a matter of luck . The bitch lost her hold on Jennifer throat after she flung her down on the gound, and I think probably grabbed the face by mistake. The attack was certainly lethal in intent, so whilst I would be much more upset, I think my overall decisions would be just the same.
On the practical front, I talked to someone last night who also had a dog attacked by an APBT a couple of years back. She knew the owner and the dog - they lived close by. Her dog was quite badly hurt too, and needed surgery. Never recovered enough to be shown again, either. She did report it to the police, and they refused to act, as the guy was a known local "nutter" and was frequently aggressive to the police, she didnt want her name to appear on a complaint in case he took revenge, and the police could not guarantee anoninimity to her! However, it does go to show that perhaps the police are not quite so keen on persuing the DDA in this area!
bye
Gwen