Makes no sense does it?
My children (in general) needing to be over 7yrs for a pup rule, sounds great next to needs to be 22yrs. :-D
But, to me their ruling is just ridiculous as they are not refusing to sell a pup to people with younger/older children are they? They would have still sold the pup to the family so why do they not wish to see how the children interact with the pups to gage whether they were suitable or not?
If a breeder wishes to make a ruling that they will not sell
any pups or allow anyone to view them under 22yrs that is their prerogative with all the impulse buys and mistreatments of puppies/dogs I have no problem with a breeder making a stance like that it is up to them who they wish to sell their pups to. However, they were not doing that........ it was just a socialising rule, not that they would not home to people with under 22 year olds. **scratching head**
Maybe they think people under 22 years carry a deadly disease :-D
The under 22's would be handling the pups the minute they got them home.

Anyhow, regardless of all that nonsense not seeing the dam is a walk away without a doubt, so glad they found you. :-)