
first they say this
An RSPCA spokeswoman said the charity had been informed of the ending of the investigation and confirmed that the initial vet who had consulted with the charity had stated the dog's injuries were 'consistent' with the 'kicked to death' claim made by the owner.
then this
One would assume that a puppy being kicked to death would show massive internal injuries.
am i reading something wrong,
did the rspca vet look at the puppy and
are they saying the first vet lied?