
I remember the dog licence being supposedly compulsary, and very few people actually bothered to get one which is why it was stopped. It cost more to collect than the money coming in for it.
What worries me is if it came into force that dogs had to be licensed, how could you tell in say a pack of dogs of the same breed which dog is which? Also the way that authorities think these days they would probably make it compulsary to be microchipped which I am very much against and I know other dog owners who are equally against microchipping. My dogs are registered at the KC, which is like a licence if you think about it, they are tattooed and DNA registered with another company.
And even with all methods of id and licensing being taken into account, it still would not work, it would tie up an endless amount of time for the police or perhaps the RSPCA inspectors who are often criticised for not dealing with cruelty cases even now. The only way it could work would to be set up a new organisation with legal powers and employ officers, which would cost a lot of money, would you be prepoared to pay several hundred pounds a year to have such an organisation? I don't know about anyone else here but I would rather spend hundreds of pounds a year on my dogs. (Yes they are spoilt) :-D