
1) Anyone who sells a pup is a commercial breeders - may not be on a full time basis, may not be only source of income, but the act of selling rather than giving makes it a commercial activity. However, Local Authorities usually look at it as breeding more that 4 litters per year (although they can decide that commercial breeding is taking place with less than this, if they think they have cause) and Tax Authorities usually look at it from a profit angle - they don't care about how many pups are sold, hours are put in, other jobs are held, they jsut want ot know if a profit is made, and if so have you declared it - the same with any profit form any ativity or hobby.
2) Again, in whose eyes - Local Authority angle given in (1), Tax Authorities don't care about the status, only the profit line. In the eyes of the KC the 4 litter rule applies. So are we deciding on some figure between Zero and Four litters per year for the definition? This is the problem, isn't it? And then comes the difference of breed and litter size- some giant breeds produce more in one litter than lots of toy breeds would produce in 4. So I think my definition comes close to the Tax one, if you make a profit, then it is a commercial activity.
3) I think so
4) See answer 2 - I don't think we can hinge this one just on number of litters. OK. over 4 is commercial in the eyes of Authorities, but number of pups/profit made have to come into it.
bye
Gwen
ps
Just to throw a spanner in the works - we usually seem to use "commercial Breeder" in a derogatory fashion - almost synonymous with puppy farm. Yet many of our most famous kennels are commercial breeders, and breed to the highest standard with the best possible care.