
I enjoy both :) I love handling the dogs and having a day out without too much hassle but I also love the challenge of judging.
As for lists and judging appointments etc: Yes, seminars are a must these days. You need to do them before you progress onto an A list and, in quite a few Clubs, a breed specific seminar (and possibly exam) is required for inclusion onto the B list too. I think seminars are good things really - if people can't be bothered to go to them then they have no interest in the breed as far as I'm concerned. I've heard the old excuse of "not having enough time to do seminars as well as everything else in life" but to me that doesn't hold water. I bet you anyone who says that would soon find the time to take a day out to judge the breed ;) If people can get themselves onto a B list then the appointments will come.
Re: CC judges doing the breed they're passed for at Open shows, I personally don't agree with it. People can't be saying one minute that a judge on a B list isn't getting appointments and then say that CC judges should be able to judge more often which means judging at Open level, thus taking away the appointments from the B list judges. I only judge my breed once every three or four years due to being passed for CCs. It's a shame but, if all judges were only allowed to judge a certain breed with CCs once every three years, then all the judges on the A list would probably have their fair share of appointments. It's not only all-rounders who judge too often, there are many breed specialists who do it too. We have one who did October 2006 and is doing July 2008 - way too close IMO.
I guess it all comes down to fair play.
Debs