Not logged inChampdogs Information Exchange
By LisaW
Date 24.08.01 17:43 UTC
From browsing through the local newspapers to checking out various internet sites, I am beginning to wonder is there any end to all these puppies being bred? Check it out for yourselves. I dread to think how many there are being bred each week.
At the same time we see thousands and thousands of dogs in rescue centres looking for new homes (and remember not even all the reputable centres follow a non-destruction policy)
There surely cannot be enough homes for all these puppies. If breeders stopped breeding dogs tomorrow and didn't breed for a number of years, (and the rescue centres didn't destroy) there would still be a backlog of dogs needing homes.
This really does worry me
I understand that people want specific breeds so they know what 'package' they are getting and that people want a life-long companion that they have from the start in the shape of a pup, but surely we can't keep justifying this breeding.
Hi Lisa
Responsible breeders make sure they can home their puppies before they have a litter. We dont have puppies very often but always make sure they have good loving homes to go to. If for some reason the new owner does not want the dog anymore (which has never happened yet as we have always tried to make sure the new owners are well suited to the dog and will love and care for it) we would take the puppy back and re-home it ourselves.
It is the irresponsible dog owners who let their dogs 'escape' whilst in season that causes a lot of these unwanted puppies. Those who think owning a dog has no reponsibilities! and buy one without giving it serious thought about how big it will grow and how much its up keep will be.
When the novelty of the dog has worn off it up to the authorities to pick up the pieces!
I would never let any of my puppies go to homes where I suspected it was just a spur of the moment thing.
Rescue dogs can make wonderful pets. My nan rescued a dog from being shot because the owner said it was embarasing him by wandering the streets scrounging for food. When we went to fetch the dog the man had gone to the pub to get drunk so he could shoot it when he got back. The dog was tied up in a barn so tight it could not even sit down.
When we got him home we bathed his cut feet and fed him and he never made a murmer. That dog turned out to be my nans gaurdian angel. It worshiped the ground she walked on! He was a lovely dog.
So you see it is not responsible breeders it is irresponsible owners who fill the rescue centres
Longdog
By Polly
Date 24.08.01 18:49 UTC

Responsible breeders do try their best for their puppies. However sometimes even the best laid plans go awry. A friend of mine found what she thought was the perfect home for one of her puppies. Without telling her the owner found she could not cope with her dog, so at two years old the dog was put into a rescue kennels. the kennels in question have the same policy as the RSPCA, they refuse to co-operate with breed rescues who very often have waiting lists of people who want to offer a loving home to one such dog. Luckily a friend of mine worked in the aforesaid kennel and telephoned me to say the dog had been handed in. We did not know who had bred it, but were lucky enough to have handed in with it a vaccination certificate, from which I was able to identify the dog and inform the breeder who was understanderably very upset.
The rescue kennel turned away the breeder saying she was not going to get the dog, they would not let it go to anyone from the breed rescue or anyone who said they knew the breed, "just incase it was a breeder trying to get the dog off them"! Eventually I managed to get the dog a really good home, Rory had just lost his little crossbreed, so I told him to go to the kennels and pretend that he did not know the breed in question, also he should say he was a police officer, and that the kennel would then release the dog to him. This he did and the dog did go to live with him, it did go "on the beat" when he patrolled at night around Windsor. The point is that we had a waiting list of potential homes but the Rescue Kennel would not co-operate with us in any way, so we had to use this ruse to get the dog into a good home!
As Long Dog says it is not the responsible breeder who fills rescue kennels, it is sometimes the fault of the rescue kennels policy as well as irresponsible breeders. Whil a t a rescue kennel, having gone there to give a donation and food to them for contacting the breed rescue, I was unfortunate enough to meet an irresponsible breeder. She had brought in a litter of rottweiler - lab crossbred pups. She happily told us she had mated her rottweiler bitch to her friends lab in order to show her children how bitches had puppies!!! Now she did not want the puppies, and as her bitch "had had a litter which bitches need, to have to make them settled" she needed "to get rid of the pups"! She went on to inform us she "did not want strangers traipsing through her house at all hours just to get a puppy"! Six little puppies more to go to the rescue!
By Ellie
Date 24.08.01 19:20 UTC
At the risk of making myself extremely unpopular and opening a can of worms, how can anyone, and I mean anyone be sure when they mate their bitch that they can rehome all of the puppies? How? It's the old story, "Ooh puppies, oh yes I'll have one" - until the puppies actually arrive and then the excuses start. Or meantime they have gone elsewhere and "got sorted" I am sorry but I firmly believe there are simply too many people breeding too many dogs! There is a chap in my area on benefits who has about seven kids. He has acquired two mastiffs, of doubtful origin in that they have defects and he is planning to breed from them "to make some money". (He's obviously heavily into breeding!) Where is the law that says "NO, Sorry you are not allowed to breed!" Something has got to be done. Dogs pregnancies are so short and pups can be gone in a few weeks - so what do people see? £££££££££ I rest my case.
By Bec
Date 24.08.01 21:18 UTC
I am of the firm opinion that if you are not prepared to care for your pups for as long as is necessary to find them good homes then you shouldn't breed at all. Not so difficult for those of us with little breeds but for those with big breeds which produce large litters this may be a problem. But thats the breeders problem. If you couldn't cope then don't do it.
By donnamwilliams1
Date 27.08.01 18:24 UTC
Hear hear ! well said. A responsible breeder will hold on to the pups, no matter how long until they are satisfied that a good home is found - a responsible breeder will also tell you that there is no £££££££££ in breeding - it is done for the love of the dog
By John
Date 24.08.01 19:14 UTC
Don't get me wrong Lisa, I'm not hitting at the responsible breeder in the post below. There are hundreds of breeders out there who take the greatest care to give their puppies the best possible start in life. And lets face it, without breeders we would have no dogs! Some areas of the country do not have many rescue dogs at all! In that I'm not talking breed society rescues, I'm talking the general dog rescue. It's a fact that the Hearing Dogs which is in my area could not fine suitable dogs in this area and had to "Import" dogs from other parts of the country.
Trouble is, we all have our own agenda. I work my dogs so I want a "Clean Piece of Paper" to start work on when I start training. Show people have their own ideas of what they think is going to be the best puppy to bring on for show and so the list goes on. The other thing is, and I'm saying it a bit tongue in cheek but the more dogs which come out of the rescue, the more room for the bad breeders to stick their dogs on the grounds that they are "Satisfying a need"
Regards, John

I have a numerically samll breed, which had only 102 puppies registered last year. there is a small supply and demand, and we breed knowing we will have to keep the pups until the right homes are found, which could be up to 12 or 16 weeks if there is more than one litter ready at the same time, or a predominance of one sex. I had an enquiry from someone who had previously aquired one of our breed from a commercial kennels that is a pet superstore and Kennels based in the North. He wondered why proper breeders didn't breed more, then he wouldn't have had to resort to this place to find a puppy! sadly his dog died due to an allergic reaction to medication at only 6 years old. Even if we all stopped breeding now, the dogs available in rescue are not necessarily what someone wants. The vast majority are out and out mongrels or poor quality irresponsibly bred pseudo pedigrees, people are drawn to specific breeds, because of their particular physical and mental characteristics, which are more uniform in purebreds. There is sadly a culture that allows people to offload their responsibilities for the results of their carelessness on someone else. Someone will find those pups a home. What they should have done is have their bitch spayed in early pregnancy, or the pups culled at birth! the spaying argument is also useless here, the irresponsible can't be bothered to spay, the responsible who do are unlikely to have let their bitch or dog have unplanned pups anyway!
By LisaW
Date 25.08.01 07:07 UTC
Thanks everyone for the replies. Most interesting.
It's the numbers that bother me. Even with the responsible breeders, if they breed one or two litters per year (or whatever, since this will obviously vary) then even if those pups go to good life-long homes, and say on average depending on breed, the pups go on to live for 10 years or so, well that is another good home gone. I'm just extremely worried about the excess of it all.
I suppose as a Greyhound fan (having a rescued one myself) I feel so sad that for every pup that is born and sold, that's another chance for a rescued dog to get another start in life. I'm not saying that everyone should have a rescued. I understand that that is not always practical, but I do question the amount of pups being bred even from responsible breeders. There are simply not enough homes for dogs, especially now since many people's lives are very busy, working long hours, etc.
It would be interesting to know how many pups were actually bred last year alone by responsible breeders (all breeds)
By Leigh
Date 25.08.01 08:09 UTC
From the 1st January 2000 to 31st December 2000:
Hounds.. 11,560
Gundogs 86,226
Terriers.. 40,085
137,871
Utility... 24,350
Working 29,541
Pastoral 28,503
Toys .... 27,585
109,979
Total Registered 347,850.
Cross Breeds (whether accidental or deliberate) think of a number and add as many noughts as you like :rolleyes:
Leigh
Source: KC BRS AA4/2
By Bec
Date 25.08.01 08:19 UTC
I actually make it only 247850!
By Leigh
Date 25.08.01 08:21 UTC
Mongrels ?
By Ellie
Date 25.08.01 09:43 UTC
Maybe that's the answer - a law stating anyone that has a pedigree dog has to rescue another!? Oh well, just a thought.
With figures like that it is extremely worrying.
So many of the breeds need special understanding too, whether because of size or instinct or character as other shave said.
I get so mad when I see in magazines BSD breeders advertisig every month. They are not that well known but there is a very active rescue because they are just not easy dogs, because like many others they need to be on the go all day mentally if not physically.
i am proud to e associated with the breeder I got my puppy from, as it was the first time shehad bred in 4 years, and she is also active in rescue.
By Bessamour
Date 21.09.01 22:19 UTC
As is said, <<If you can breed, you can rescue>>
Valerie
By LisaW
Date 26.08.01 07:13 UTC
Thanks Leigh, for the statistics. I'm really shocked at the numbers. If this is an average year and this sort of breeding (numerically) happens every year, then I simply cannot believe that all these pups get life-long homes. No wonder poor Greyhounds don't stand much of a chance when they retire from racing having to compete with such figures.
Is it really 'responsible' to breed this amount of dogs each year? What does everyone else think? I'd be very interested in hearing your views. Best wishes.
By Leigh
Date 26.08.01 09:42 UTC
Your welcome Lisa.
I would like to pick up on one thing in your posting :-)
Ex~Racing Greyhounds. WHY are the breeders of Racing Greyhounds not made to take back THEIR dogs ? If ALL breeders are supposed to be responsible for the dogs that THEY bring into the world, how comes they are given immunity?
Do not forget that the figures above will not include the total number of racing greyhounds that are bred each year.
Leigh
By LisaW
Date 27.08.01 09:08 UTC
Good point Leigh. I agree. Greyhound breeders should be made to be more responsible for the animals they breed. However, don't forget that just like other breeds, once they are sold as pups they are then the property of their owners (whether they race them or not) and it is them really who should be looking after their dogs when they've finished racing.
For all breeds, how many breeders would be in a position to take back all the pups (that are now adult dogs) they had ever bred?
My particular Greyhound was a lucky boy because he had an owner who cared about him. After his racing days were over, the owner paid for him to be kept in 'resting' kennels until a good home was found for him (and the owner was prepared to keep paying until a good home was found)
Unfortunately most are not so lucky. There are some good owners and trainers but from my experience there are not enough of these.
There is no other breed of dog that is subject to such continuous cruelty. Some of the things that happen to the graceful gentle Greyhounds would shock the majority of people.
By donnamwilliams1
Date 26.08.01 10:13 UTC
347,850 is alot of dogs however, considering the UK population is 59,500,900, I really don't see the issue. The main probelm we all have is irresponsible owners and puppy farms - this is why there are so many rescue dogs, not because there aren't enough homes for these puppies.
By LisaW
Date 27.08.01 09:16 UTC
Look at those figures again then think about the number of dogs that are destroyed each year because homes cannot be found, etc. I don't agree that it is just puppy farms and irresponsible breeders that are causing the problem (although of course they do add to it)
The issue is how responsible is it for 'responsible' breeders to keep breeding this amount of dogs. Remember Leigh's statistics were for those (I assume) that are registered and we know about. So that represents the 'responsible' side of dog breeding. I'm not saying stop breeding dogs but noone can dispute the fact that there are just not enough homes for the amount of dogs in this country.
Take a trip to your local rescue kennels and chances are they are full to capacity.
By donnamwilliams1
Date 27.08.01 09:53 UTC
It all comes down to responsibility of the breeder and owner. There are so many rescue dogs because circumstanses change - what were responsible owners may no longer be so due to the change and it's generally the dog that suffers, the dog may become defensive against abuse thus not making it suitable for rehoming thus have to be put to sleep because the once responsible owner did not make a responsible move i.e contacting the breeder to send the dog back. I have seen this myself, a lady I know very well purchased 2 dogs - were very well looked after until circumstanses changed, the dogs were left alone, hardly fed, no time spent with them at all - and I still had to persuade her to let me have the dogs - after 2 months and threats, she eventually let me have them - it took them 2 months to settle in here by which time the bitch had puppies (she should never have been mated being so small) - it took my partner 5 hours to groom one of them - he was so full of matts and dirt. I will not rehome them as I feel they have been through so much already and I don't want to risk that again. I would say it is responsible for breeders to breed this amount of dogs if they are willing to take them back if the new owner can no longer cope with them - the new owner should also be responsible engough to inform the breeder that they can no longer care for the dog - it works both ways - if people were more responsible, it would lessen the problem. Again I think there are enough homes but maybee not enough responsible homes.
Does anyone know how many pups are born to "racing greyhounds" in the UK and Eire per year, as I assume those would not appear in the KC lists?
Christine

Yes | have been to mine on numbers of occasions. they are full of Mongrels and cossbreds. th recognisable breeds are usually very poor specimens. These are most often the very popular breeds, in my dogs home you find GSDs Staffies, but what I would call really scrub bred. A lot of Lurchers and terrier crosses also. On one occasion, ignoring the poor quality GSDs (we get a lot bred round here without papers!) there were only half a dozen one could call pedigree!
By Lucy
Date 28.08.01 13:00 UTC
I do agree with the issues of Breeders/ rescues and owners themselves could do more for the unwanted dog population.
But society in general has made these un-worthy owners. People who get a dog and find its to "difficalt" to house train or too "time consuming" to look after a pet, what are they teaching thier children? That if something doesent go thier way Get rid of it. Its appaling!
Anyone can own a dog or have a child, u dont need to be a nice person, have good morals as long as the monies there u can get a dog.
Rescues are also at fault on this one. I spent 3 months looking for a companion for my Staffie. We contacted many rescue centres including the NCDL, Battersea and breed associated rescue. No-one would re-home a dog with us because we have a child under 5! Now I can understand if the dog has a past history of neglect and abuse obviously it would need a very understanding home (something a 2 year old isent!)
But they wouldent even consider for Puppy adoption! We had to go to a breeder amd pay alot of money for a pet when I would have rather given a home to a needy animal and given the cash to the charity it came from.
We were told we would recive a call from all the shelters we'd been 2.....5 months down the line and still no word.
Its a shame that rescuers, breeders and owners were a little more understanding and had the dogs best interests in heart instead of the money and politics in it all.

This is the problem when making generalisations. I had my first dog when my daughter was a toddler, and held onto her through a 2nd pregnancy and divorce. When I had my second dog as a pup, my younger child was a toddler, so I had two pre school kids. I have been happy to have my pups go to families, based on my own experience, but last year I had a pup back from a nice family with small kids, the pup had been allowed to get into rough play with the kids, chasing and mouthing, they failed to do any training, and I had the pup back. Now I will probably not let a pup go to parents of young children, unless they are experienced dog owners. The rescues are even more wary of making a bad placement, as after all the poor dog is already second hand!
By LisaW
Date 31.08.01 08:11 UTC
That's a really interesting point Lucy. You're right about rescue centres. I understand they have to be particular but sometimes I think they are not very helpful in allowing rescues to go to new homes. I know this is a doggy site but when I went to the local RSPCA last year to offer homes to 2 kittens, they were only allowing the kittens to go to homes where someone was home all day because the kittens needed feeding every 3 to 4 hours. For me, that was not a problem but I was home, but I mean a cat is a cat. Of course they need care, but let's be honest about it, cats are independent and survivors. You know what I mean.
A friend of mine adopted an adult cat because they wouldn't allow her to have a kitten because she was working all day (even though her parents are retired and live close by and could easily have popped in during the day to see to the kitten)
I've just given this example to show how ridiculous the whole situation has got. They are worse when it comes to dogs. Then there is nothing to stop those who would like a rescue but are turned down from then going to get a pup. The sad thing is of course is that those who do want to give a rescue another chance are often the really responsible people (not saying that people who buy pups are irresponsible)
It was a very interesting point that you raised there Lucy. Anybody else got any examples?
An earlier message asked how many Greyhound pups are born each year. Phew. That would be a tricky one. If you think that 30,000 Greyhounds retire EACH YEAR (approximately) then one can only assume that a similar (or larger) amount of pups are born each year. Don't really know though.
By Ellie
Date 31.08.01 14:23 UTC
I don't know if anybody has read this too, but in one of the Dog mags, it is reported that registration of dogs with KC is down by 20% - so what does this say? It just seems to me that anyone can breed, not bother to register the pups and still manage to sell the pups to owners who aren't really bothered about where they have come from. I thought the whole idea of registration was so you could be sure from whom you were buying, check back the breeding for any problems etc. but it seems that these people who don't register the pups still manage to get the same money or thereabouts for the pups! Doesn't this just encourage the unreputables to breed from anything for money? Surely the law is to blame for this. I spoke to a lady last night who had allowed her bitch to be covered by accident by a relatives dog!?! But it's ok because she is making money from the pups so it has all been worthwhile - so much so that she has allowed it to happen with her other bitch! Sick! Sick! SICK!
By LisaW
Date 03.09.01 13:15 UTC
Horrifying to read your message Ellie. What is wrong with people eh? Can't believe people can be so irresponsible and just rub their hands with glee at the money. No wonder there is such a problem with unwanted dogs.
Thanks for telling us about this.
Powered by mwForum 2.29.6 © 1999-2015 Markus Wichitill