
Hi Isabel,
Apologies and a big slap to me for thinking you were being reasonable and not generalising ;-) :-D I was giving you credit for acknowledging that being out of the house full time is different to working full time or making care arrangements.
When I mentioned Christine and Val I was meaning that I liked the fact they didn't necessarily zone in on the actually hours or the wording full-time BUT that they judge each case on it's own merit and by the people FIRST not the jobs or hours they worked or that is how I interpretated it. ( both are big enough to slap me if I a wrong). If Val has such a cut and dry "no way" attitude then 2 wonderful owners would not have her dogs. I know her criteria is very strict but not so strict as to be silly in my opinion of course.
I didn't like to read people don't take things into consideration and are not flexible. To me it sounds very judgemental. Both Christine and Val didn't say, " I would never".... that is what I liked and respected about their posts. The open mindedness of them.
Christine works very very early hours so to her dogs I am sure she is only out the house a few hours ;-) I have never met many people so dedicated. A non worker would have to go something to out shine her care to her dogs.
I personally have found in my experience it is the families with woman at home with kids not coping are the first to rehome dogs. I have helped rehome a few dogs in these circumstances.
Whilst I share the concern about selling to full time workers and I personally haven't yet myself ,I again just don't like and didn't really like the " I would never" posts when each and every person who said it has no 100% guarantee that people are not working or situations haven't changed. In this day they often do.