
I think we are arguing at cross purposes here...
Firstly, i took issue at the word 'dominance' and NOT, as you will see if you read my post properly, the 'if allowed to be' part of your post.
Any dog, if given no boundaries, if allowed to behave in an inappropriate manner, may became a P.I.T.A. to live with. I never said any different.
Dominance towards humans suggests that the dog has some forward planning, some long term agenda and that is simplyl NOT TRUE, and it is THAT which i referred to as 'a load of rubbish', NOT your post!
As i said before, dogs do what is rewarding, they perform many many different behaviours all day everyday... if one of those behaviours is rewarded then it will be repeated, its up to the owner to make sure that inappropriate behaviours such as play biting, growling, barking at the postman, peeing up the sofa etc are NOT rewarded.
I disagree with tapping a dog on the nose for biting, and the feisty working bred terriers i have owned, and those i have known, would ALL at just 17 weeks of age, have taken THAT kind of 'reprimand' as a challenge, not a punishment and would have reacted further.
What the puppies mother would in fact do, is ignore the pup, then probably snap at the pup, i have never yet seen a bitch PIN DOWN a pup for simply play biting, although i dont doubt they may do it in extreme circumstances.
That, however is fairly irrelevant since even a 17 week old pup, and in fact pups much younger, do NOT view the human owner as their mother.
I agree we are NOT a member of the dogs pack..... i disagree that we are their pack leaders... that statement you made
"We are NOT a member of their pack = we are the pack leaders and a dog pack leader would never allow a puppy or another dog to hurt or challenge them."
does not actually make any sense whatsoever. The pack leader in a wolf pack, IS a member of the pack. That however brings me on to the second part of that statement.... actually an alpha wolf WOULD allow puppies to nip, play, growl over food, beg for food and all manner of other fairly 'rude' things, to a certain extent.
In any case, as interesting as discussing wolf pack behaviour is, its not particularly relevant to dog behaviour, since at best dogs are only comparable with wolf CUBS and not adult wolves.
Further to that, feral dog 'packs' do not interact in the same way as wolf packs, and the old studies on wolf pack behaviour have been proven to be fairly flawed.
If you are following the (IMNSHO, flawed) logic that the pup will accept and understand a human trying to mimic canine behaviour, then you will realise that a light tap in the face is in fact NOT a deterrent, as can be seen when my dogs try to initiate rough play iwth one another, by walloping each other in the face with a paw!
It is pretty irrelevant whether or not an experienced owner/breeder would let a pup behave in this way, since the OP is not either of those things (no offence intended there) and they are requesting the opinions of others. The pup has NO idea if the owner is inexperienced, he can only learn from the lessons he is given, and if biting and nipping is being made in any way rewarding, he will carry it on. (I have a 10 year old saluki bitch here, for various reasons SHE finds play biting highly rewarding and so she does it to me, for yet more variuos reasons i choose (note here i CHOOSE, not i give up, cant be bothered or anything else) to let her continue, because it doesnt cause ME any problems as she only does this to ME and does not have access to kids, other people etc, so its not just male terriers who can be nippy little buggers when they want to be).
I dont recall stating anywhere that a pup of any breed, terrier or otherwise, should be allowed to carry on in the hope they will grow out of it.
I too do not advocate any hard or unkind treatment of any dog.... however i also do not advocate useless 'training' methods such as a tap in the face. If MY children (when i decide to have them) find it rewarding to bite me, then i certainly WONT be hitting them in the face, and id question WHY they found it more rewarding to behave in an obnoxious way than in a nice way.
I agree, dogs are not people (and people are not dogs, which confuses me further as to why you belive dogs view people AS dogs???) and yes we do need to provide boundaries and 'leadership' for them, but the way to do this is to respect and understand WHY a dog does something properly, and not just put it down to 'dominance'.
I hope that clears a few issues up.
Em