
D4wn,
I obviously didn't understand the situation surrounding your "rescue" of this particular dog. I am sorry, you didn't explain this on your previous post :) I can see now why you did it. I understandably didn't think about the owners defence, not being in possession of all the facts.
I am afraid that I do not think that people being banned from owning animals and getting a fine is suitable punishment and totally agree with you that it is not enough for inflicting torture and pain upon any living thing. Afterall, people can move to a new area and start all over again. The RSPCA do not have the resources to track them, the only way they will know, is if the said people come to their attention again.
How would these people know that it was only "her" that saw the dog. Do you think that she was the only person to see it? Or do they, as I do, live in the middle of nowhere so they could be 100% guaranteed it was her??? I doubt it very much.
Yes, the law has been changed, but I doubt it will make much difference. You do not seem to have much belief in the RSPCA, so what makes you think that they will remove an animal before injury/cruelty occurs? And in cases like this, clearly there is not enough evidence, or the dog would not still be (we belive at the moment) suffering.