
You are misunderstanding Rooky. Anyone who is breeding for the betterment of the breed and trying to produce quality for this reason would KC register. A non KC reg pup may ACCIDENTALLY turn out to be a good example, by dint of good ancestors that have got into the wrong hands. Those who breed without KC reg are doing so because they either have infringed the rules and can't, or don't care about whether the pups are good quality, they are just a commodity.
A breeder interested in the good of the breed breeds each litter with the hope that if any go on t0o be br3ed from they will make a positive impact on the breed, for this to happen they need to be part of the registered gene pool.
Also how do you know how your unregistered dog compares in quality to the standard? Unless you are an extremely knowledgeable breed judge then how could you judge? Even the very experienced breeder likes to compare their efforts with those of their peers, as it is easy to go to far in a direction unless you take a step back and dispassionately evalute the quality against the best of others.
I do entirely agree with you about the not knowing if you might not want to get more deeply involved with a breed when you get the firts pup. That is why often pet owners start to show and go on to do well, but without KC reg they don't have the option.