
Pet-only dogs don’t need testing? Absolute nonsense. They can get health problems exactly the same as show dogs, genetic issues don’t just suddenly disappear because a dog will never be shown.
I did a full panel of genetic tests on my papillon who no longer shows and will never be bred from because of luxating patellas (corrected by surgery). Why? Because I know he was hereditary clear for NAD and pap-PRA as is parents are clear, but no one was testing for vWD1 or fVII then so I didn’t have results for that. Carriers for vWD1 can show a milder version of the disease (which affects blood clotting) so I thought it was important to find out if he was at risk.
He’s clear for fVII and carries vWD1, but luckily he doesn’t seem to show any issues with bleeding. But if he was likely to have any issues there I wanted to be forewarned, not find out only if he had emergency surgery or an accident and bled to death because we weren’t prepared.
And if nothing else, this information is useful to the breed as a whole. If River carries, either his sire or dam or both also carries or is affected. His sibling and half siblings should also be tested.
If I hadn’t known about this (and his knees were normal), my friend could have easily used him on her bitch because he’d make cracking agility dogs. But they both carry vWD1, so we’d likely get affected pups.