Lexy:> That's probably because Pettrac has only just been mentioned by Hoggie

Hoggie mentioned Petlog & PETtrac in previous posts as other posters mentioned AVID.  Suppose confusion occurs often during written comunication.

Jeangenie: > For the ease of the customers it might be sensible to change to Petlog for future litters

Don't think we are allowed to advertise/promote/advocate one company over another on CD site.

> <br />Incidentally the PetTrac website quotes £16.95 for pet owners to change details

Think it would be a good idea to go through the whole process to gain the 'final' cost if the Breeder hasn't made
original new owner changes not the new owner ammending details.

> <br />Hoggie mentioned Petlog & PETtrac in previous posts as other posters mentioned AVID.  Suppose confusion occurs often during written comunication.

Yes and the very first time you mentioned it, on this thread, was the post you made today at 18:33 and not before.

Lexy:  > Yes and the very first time you mentioned it, on this thread, was the post you made today at 18:33 and not before

No, I posted re my experiences of PETtrac & Petlog Training Courses.  Everyone else assumed it was Petlog I was discussing which
I hadn't picked up on until THEIR only mentioned of Petlog as their point of reference was today 31/12/20.

Jeangenie referred to Petlog on 29 December.

Pricivius:> Jeangenie referred to Petlog on 29 December

I'm sure Jeangenie did. Carol C referred to Avid, I referred to PETtrac....

But we were unaware that the company u use and the figures quoted etc were for pet trac until almost the last.after that it all became clear where the crossed wires were .
Knowing that would have produced a whole.different discussion no doubt

I believe the OP was concerned about one of her Puppy's welfare.  It has been lost through out the thread IMO.  Posters come to the site for advice & support - not lectures - your right - I'm wrong and if you don't share/acknowledge my views - you are a terrible pet owner....it's assumption and judgement that creates 'off
thread' nastiness.  Has there been any further posts from the owner concerned - NO.  I will contact her by PM to make a donation towards getting her Puppy back - will any of you contribute?

Ah you're are with petrack, I just assumed petlog as I believe he the biggest one.

It's a shame breeder when they first register the child they can't register it in both names, so theirs and the new owners at the same time. But that would lose the components some income.
When I changed my girls I asked for her breeder to be left as a second contact.

> Pricivius:> Jeangenie referred to Petlog on 29 December

I'm sure Jeangenie did. Carol C referred to Avid, I referred to PETtrac....

>

I was referring to you stating that the only
mention of Petlog was 31 December, but it wasn’t as jeangenie mentioned it on 29 December and posted a link to it.

Pricivius:> <br />I was referring to you stating that the only<br />mention of Petlog was 31 December, but it wasn’t as jeangenie mentioned it on 29 December and posted a link to it.

I discussed both PETtrac & Petlog on the same day.  What is your point here? It has been a case of ASSUPTION yet again (my way or the highway). I've never had a shared post with you before so where has this come from? No matter - the group have managed to have the thread pulled again....

>I discussed both PETtrac & Petlog on the same day.

It would have been helpful to have pointed out that you use PetTrac and not the primary database, Petlog, in your first reply after proof was given that Petlog do not charge £37 to transfer microchip details to a new owner, instead of carrying on the discussion for two days before revealing the fact. (Even though Pettrac quotes a cost of £16.95, so it's still not clear where £37 comes from.)

>No matter - the group have managed to have the thread pulled again....

Apart from the fact that you're also part of 'the group' has it really been pulled?

Hi, sorry for my late reply.....I've been tearing my hair out trying to find a way of getting this poor puppy home.....I contacted my auntie who lives in Peterborough (she has one of my bitches brothers) has agreed to drive and pick him up for me. I honestly can't thank her enough, she going to keep him till I can get to her to pick him up.

What a sorry mess

Great news

That's brilliant.well done to u and aunty

Excellent! Great teamwork.

That’s good news, OP.

> What is your point here?

My point is you said Petlog was not mentioned until 31 December, but that’s not correct as far as I can see. It was mentioned on 29 December, with a link to its website.

> I've never had a shared post with you before so where has this come from?

Where has what come from? I replied to the OP as part of the general conversation and then watched the thread as it developed as I was interested. Are we only allowed to quote from posters we have quoted previously? That doesn’t make sense...

> Are we only allowed to quote from posters we have quoted previously? That doesn’t make sense...

No, there is no rule as to who you reply to.

Sometimes people are not overly clear/give all the information needed in their post/s which makes it awfully hard to give full replies/advice to, that's when confusion sets in

At least the pup will now be safe, great news

Very glad to hear that your pup will be safe

Jeangenie:> Apart from the fact that you're also part of 'the group' has it really been pulled?

Not quite sure what the above question means. Could you explain please?

If you are referring to "the thread being pulled" and would like to check with
moderators by email, I am sure you will find the thread was locked/unaccessible
either that or the 'group' has special powers  the rest of us don't know about.

Hoggie the thread hasn't been pulled or locked we are all still commenting on it , yourself included  . Of course it may be in the future . Perhaps u have knowledge that rest of us don't of course ?

Maybe admin wanted to tidy up some things but the thread is still very much active so no not pulled

Thank you satin collie

Lexy:

> Sometimes people are not overly clear/give all the information needed in their post/s

Confusion sets in when those who wish to reply don't gather facts before that reply is made.

I have often read posts expressing the need for more information before a response happens.

> Lexy:<br /><br />> Sometimes people are not overly clear/give all the information needed in their post/s<br />Confusion sets in when those who wish to reply don't gather facts before that reply is made.<br /><br />I have often read posts expressing the need for more information before a response happens.

Works both ways... if folk give more facts to start with ! !

satincollie> admin wanted to tidy up some things.

Thank you for clarification - I realised this when logging in tonight.

Lexy: > Works both ways... if folk give more facts to start with ! !

Sorry - not in my experience. The more facts you give, the more 'off course/ direction' the responses it will be always with
the same intent - never a good one.

It works one way - lets pick through every post ever posted by a certain person and argue.  No ifs, no buts, no I was only....

Such a shame as the OP's concerns were lost amidst all of the 'verbal boxing'.  I wonder if people will be kinder in 2021?

I don't think the op was watching anything if u read their latest post. They have been busy sorting out getting their puppy picked up . People had given pertinent help back at.the beginning and thank goodness puppy is going to be fine
As for giving information; to have any discussion it does help where possible if  u are in full possession of.the facts.
I have found more and more.that isn't the case hence why discussions go off piste and frustration occurs

furriefriends:> As for giving information; to have any discussion it does help where possible if  u are in full possession of.the fact

Apologies but I think we both know it wouldn't matter a jot if I declared the ocean tasted salty and provided some to drink.
I would be argued with that it was sweet.

> I have found more and more.that isn't the case hence why discussions go off piste and frustration occurs

Whoa.  What is written and perception by others can be two totally different things.  Individuals choose.

> I don't think the op was watching anything if u read their latest post.

I should make you aware there were PM between myself & the OP.

As with this thread, initial perceptions of a particular person were made without reliable information or indeed patience toward
those with a differnet point of view which has escalated into the totally unrecognisable situation of today.

It takes two to tango as they say.  In my case 7, 8 or 9 partake in silencing if they can....hey ho....Samson & Goliath me thinks

Er ?

furriefriends: Oh dear - too much detail in my post?
I would need more detail than just an 'Er' response from you.   Hard to get the balance right .....

Er ?  = as often happens I am totally confused with your replies

furriefriends:> as often happens I am totally confused with your replies

I think we all speak English on here.  As mentioned previously, one's choice to understand is prevalent. I do speak a tiny bit
of French but I think using the 'translate' button might just add to the 'confusion'.

> 'ignore' status

Single people can choose to ignore a poster, they do not see this persons posts made on a thread but see all other posts made on the thread. Only the person who has chosen to hit the ignore button knows, no one else does.

well there is no reason why they aren't allowed to follow and reply to a thread!!! As I said earlier, the ignored person's post cant be seen by those who choose to ignore !!

> As I said earlier, the ignored person's post cant be seen by those who choose to ignore !!

I don’t think Hoggie gets it Lexy. I’d try and explain but she’s ignoring me

For anyone not ignoring me who’s confused about the ignore button (although I don’t think anyone else is) this might help

Example.

X uses ignore button on Y
X cannot see Y’s posts
Y can see X’s posts
X can see any parts of Y’s posts that have been quoted by other people

I think that’s right - unless I’m the confused one

That makes sense to me masaj

Masajackrussell, that's my understanding of the ignore button too, all quite simple

the explanation as follows
Example.

X uses ignore button on Y
X cannot see Y’s posts
Y can see X’s posts
X can see any parts of Y’s posts that have been quoted by other people

Lexy can u copy that explanation into your reply please as atm I cant do it ..that way hoggie will.see it too

Adding to this, if you’re ignoring someone you can still read their posts if you choose, by clicking on the heading of the ignored post to open it up.

This only works on the actual thread itself for me though, not the Unread Posts page.

Very helpful if you want to avoid someone’s nonsense most of the time but occasionally wonder what particular brand of nonsense they’re spouting this time!

Did not know this silverleaf so Thankyou. Although I’m not ignoring anyone at the moment...

That's very handy silverleaf thank u . Might have to give that a try

Thank you lexy

I am not sure who is being accused of bullying who here. I pointed out that I thought a poster was mistaken about something - I was not rude or offensive, merely stated that the date was incorrect. Then I got asked what my point was and where this had come from, as if I had some hidden agenda or something. I was following a thread that I had contributed to and was interested in, that’s all. No ulterior motive or conspiracy theory here.

No,  the ignored person can see all posts.

The ignore feature means that you could choose not to see my posts, but within the thread you would see.I had posted, and actually if you wanted you could click on my name and read the post anyway.