
I've not read all the replies, but the implications that a 'good breeder' will be making a tidy sum is way off mark. In the whole of my breeding plans my foundation bitch turned out to have a poor elbow grade, which, although the vet mucked up and I was still advised to breed on from some breeders, I chose not to so the money spent health testing her came to absolutely no puppies whatsoever, I recently lost her aged 14 1/2; I can think of a few breeders who, having found their dogs have less than perfect health test results would have moved them on straight away, some even advertising them as health tested and entire.
Her half sister had great health test results and taught me a lot about training gundogs, she had one litter by emergency c-section and out of the 8 pups only 6 survived and I kept one back, and I still have both those bitches now. My other breed, FCR I have a fully health tested bitch who is an astounding worker, I tried on three occasions to have a litter from her, all unsuccessful, including a last ditch attempt at AI.
The daughter I kept back has had a total of 2 litters, first litter she produced 6 healthy pups, one of which I ran on free of charge for someone who desperately wanted one of my pups from Germany. And I had a second litter, a repeat mating and hoped she'd have a similar number, but no, she had 11, which, although I might have made a small profit on that one litter, all the rest were losses, and not small losses, and the second litter breaking even.
To any good breeder, it's not about the money in any case, it's about producing good quality puppies from fully health tested backgrounds, with lots of research, none of which they charge extra for. I am amazed at how some breeders are able to bung two dogs together and charge a huge amount for puppies, and if I was 'business minded' I'd not have produced a litter knowing all the pups were going to be black, twice, as there is a premium for nicely bred chocolate Labrador pups, which many seem to take advantage of. In fact I brought this up with the ABS several years ago, with a website saying they are dedicated to breeding chocolate Labradors, ABS member, doing the minimum required health tests, and the ABS person I was speaking to simply said, at least they are health testing.
The assumptions you have made in the thread that breeders are making a nice bit of profit on the side, 'having up to say seven pups each year for three years selling them at £2000 each That's a tidy sum for the taxman to consider that it's not a business' - firstly, I don't sell my pups for that amount, maybe I could, but I choose to sell them at what I think is a fair price for the time and investment I've made in my dogs. I've had three litters in eight years, pricing my pups at the 'bottom' of what I'd say the average price is for a nicely bred pup, because for me, it's not about the money, the best homes are what I want for my pups. Overall, I've made losses, so my business plan wouldn't really be a very good one, but I have a good job which means I'm able to support my hobby. What many don't see from the outside are the hidden costs, the health testing, progesterone testing, fuel, stud dog fees, whelping equipment, increased electricity, washing machine on full time, extra food for dogs, puppies etc, KC registration, microchipping, even things like putting a puppy pack together, all costs money. I'm not an ABS member, I wouldn't want it gifted to be quite honest, as there are just far too many people using it as a 'stamp of quality' and doing the bare minimum and cutting corners, I go above what the ABS requires their members to do as requires health testing in any case. So when I see that I'm told I must be making a profit it really makes me shake my head.
None of this is meant as a criticism to the OP, but just to try and help them understand that their assumptions about all breeders making money, and so should therefore want to answer all emails/enquiries, is really off the mark. I'm sure there are plenty of breeders out there that do make money at it, I can think of a few off the top of my head who I know make their living from their dogs and who might want to answer all enquiries, but that is certainly not the case for every breeder.
I do, as it happens, try to answer most emails, I must admit I have had a few where I just simply despair and haven't had the will to type out a response, or if I have it has been a short reply to say that I don't have any pups available or planned litters. I help more people find puppies from other breeders than I have sold puppies in my time as a breeder, and try to help those enquiring understand the health tests and what to look for in a breeder, as does anyone who is passionate about their breed and wants to help puppy owners. But it is my prerogative as to whether I want to reply to an enquiry, and when I do choose to reply, I am often times disappointed that despite taking the time to explain health tests, how to look through a pedigree etc, etc, I then hear from them to say they've got a puppy and when they show me the details they've obviously ignored every single bit of advice I've passed on to them. But then I understand that my advice is given freely, and if they choose to ignore it that is entirely up to them, as it is entirely up to me as to whether I invest the time in replying to them in the first place.