Oh gosh, where to start.
>Of course not because our kids are not our dogs
I'm not sure what this means. Feeling a species-appropriate raw and whole food diet is clearly healthier than feeding the same highly processed brown pellets every day. It doesn't matter if you are a kid, a dog or an earthworm. Don't eat brown processed stuff which is unrecognisable as the food source it once was.
> Dogs usually do better on the same food rather than to chop and change all the time
That's not true actually, for many reasons. Even if someone is rotating around different kibbles, it's a better idea than constantly feeding the same one. Time and again there are recalls on different dry foods due to too much or too little of something or due to the presence of a toxin. Rotating around different foods spreads the load and reduces the risk of a dog being exposed consistently to too much or too little of a nutrient and also reduces the risk of toxins - such as heavy metals which have been found in several dry foods now - building up to the point of becoming symptomatic to the dog.
Research shows that rotating around different protein sources reduces the risk of food allergies developing.
Feeding a diverse and broad/rich diet is by far the best approach to feeding any mammal - within what is species-appropriate of course.
Yes, if a puppy has been raised on one brand of dog food and fed that for years you will see gastro issues if you change. That is because the dog's gut isn't accustomed to processing anything else. It doesn't suggest that all dogs should therefore be fed one food all their lives - quite the opposite - it suggests that raising puppies to be able to eat many different foods so that their guts develop able to process different foods, is advisable.
>isn't a 'complete raw' the same as a 'complete cooked' - only raw?
Er, the fact that it's raw is what makes it beneficial. Cooking meat removes many nutrients and good bacteria from it, and renders it much less 'useful' and bioavailable to the dog's body. Artificial vitamins and minerals (less bioavailable) then have to be added back in via mixes and powders - because cooking has removed much of it.
>Since my home-bred hounds have lived good lengthy life (longer than the norm for the breed) with minimal vet visits (there have been the odd exception of course) I've been fairly certain that they have been able to live 'healthy' lives fed on a good quality dry complete (with a small amount of tinned meat mixed in).
This is just what we call anecdotal evidence and as such, contributes nothing much. Many of us who feed raw can respond with our own personal experiences of raw fed dogs which have lived long lives. We can throw anecdotal evidence backwards and forwards forever, without getting anywhere. That's why we need science...
> Yes, we only have 2 now, but at ages 10 and 9 years respectively, I'm not going to rock the boat by trying to switch them from what they are doing well on.
I don't think I've suggested anywhere that you switch your own dogs, MamaBas? The last time I checked, this was a thread about giardia in dogs and how to feed/treat them so that it stays away and doesn't return. Feeding a diet high in healthy and good bacteria, is one sure way I know contributes towards this end.