> Truth is the dominance theory is based on flawed studies of artificial wolf packs applied to domestic dogs a sub species that has been divorced from wolves for over 60,000 years.
More than that - the latest genetic research shows that dogs and wolves evolved from a common ancestor. They were never the same species. Add in those thousands of years of selective breeding, and looking to wolves to explain their behaviour is completely and utterly pointless.
Then add in progression in the understanding of behaviour and dogs over recent years and it becomes baffling that anyone is still holding on to this idea of dominance. And not just because of the wolf thing; also because dogs have been selectively bred to want to be with us and work with us, so friction is not beneficial to that relationship. Also, studies on domestic dogs have repeatedly shown that they are not pack animals. Any hierarchy tends to be loose, fluid depending on the context at any given moment.
Mamabas, you said it yourself - why would a puppy be trying to dominate a pillow? It makes no sense. They don't try to dominate meek owners either - dogs do whatever gets them a reward of some kind, or whatever works in their favour. That may be rough play, humping, pulling on lead etc. E.g. - pulling on lead is to get them where they want to be, because it works (or so it seems to them, because it gets them there). Humping feels good and it dissipates stress, so it gains relief from stress and good feelings. It is also one of the fastest ways to get your owner paying attention to you! That applies whatever the age of the dog.
Or, if you really want to cling on to the idea of dominance, ok; it's all about control of resources. That's what dominance is for, in any species. Control of food, water, territory and breeding rights. We control where, when and how a dog sleeps, eats, plays, walks, relieves itself and lives - we are already dominant over them in every meaningful way. A bit of humping isn't going to change that! True dominant behaviour between dogs is also not like that - a truly dominant dog is calm and confident, and does not use physical means to assert their position or try to improve that position. The dogs that do use physical means are less confident animals, trying to physically control the world around them - bullies. Not dominant.
> NOTHING will convince me otherwise because I've SEEN IT
The scientists who conducted the original and subsequent studies on wolves that came up with dominance theory saw it and were sure of what they saw as well. That does not mean they were correct; nor does it mean they could not change their interpretation of what they saw over time, as improved studies and information became available. One of the biggest proponents of dominance theory was Dr David Mech, one of the world's foremost wolf biologists - and he has retracted it all, and stated clearly that he was wrong. This happens all the time. Infections were once believed to be the result of bad air. Psychosis was once believed to be demonic possession or being tormented by evil spirits (and still is, in some places). Knowledge and interpretations progress, usually for the better where behaviour is concerned, and we should progress with them.
I've seen humping too - very often, because I am a behaviourist by trade and unfortunately for me, apparently also a very inviting person to humpy dogs! But never, ever have I seen a puppy or adult do it and believed it was dominance. It's always overexcitement, play or nerves, sometimes an inability to cope with frustration (in a behavioural sense, not sexual), or simply because humping is a fantastically fast way to get a human's attention, or on occasion, because there's too much testosterone flying about and the dog would benefit from being neutered (only seen that once) or a bitch in season nearby. Indeed, the worst one was humping me as displacement behaviour because his owners were making him nervous and I was a safe person!
Also, no-one is trying to put you down. On a forum where there may be many people reading a thread like this, it is important that the most up to date information is given, especially on a subject like this because the word 'dominant' brings about all sorts of negative connotations and invites unpleasant handling from novice (or indeed experienced) owners. And as it has been thoroughly debunked, there is no reason it should still be being given as an explanation for dog behaviour towards humans.