> or I would rescue
but part of the rescue issue is poorly bred dogs sold to unsuitable homes.
Surely if good breeders bred more, and we could increase the number of good breeders, the availability of well bred (at very least carefully reared, as opposed to puppy farmed as a cash crop) pups available would increase, and the number in rescue reduce.
Without volume breeding of the kind in purely commercial enterprises the general standard temperament of the majority of dogs would improve.
If only health and temperament improved it would be something.
In my own breed where numbers are down to just double figures per year (yet still unregsitered dogs are bred and imported from Ireland), we could stand to double the number of breeders and pups bred so we could get back to three figures. At our height there were 300 pups registered annually, when I started 20+ years ago around 150, now we are at third to half that.
We need to in all the 100 least numerically large breeds (who account for only 2% of KC registrations), encourage an interest in our breed and encourage new potential breeders.
We do need as breeds to do what our constitutions tell us 'promote' our breeds in suitable venues, where suitable potential owners are likely to be. so game fairs country shows.
When I meet someone wanting to get a dog I encourage them to look at the less known/unknown breeds by telling them even tho0ugh they will need to wait they are more likely to find only real bred enthusiasts breeding, go through the breed clubs, as such breeds are generally not a money maker for puppy farmers.