> I'm just wondering if others receive sweeping statements about their breed?
Buster had stinky anal glands, when the vet saw him (not his usual vet, but from the same practice). She said he must have been in a lot of pain as his anal sacs were full, I said he hadn't shown any signs of pain and no scooting, no licking his bum etc, to which she replied "well, he's a Mastiff, they tollerate a very high level of pain".
I was a bit insulted at the time, as I watch him very closely for any signs of pain due to his elbow displasia and took it as I was being neglectfull in my observations.
However, after him being on Metecam (his usual vet's recomendation), due to his elbow displasia and some minor 'oddities' on rising coming from his hips/rear leg, I've noticed a very subtle shift in his gait. He no longer has the 'oddities' with his hips/rear leg. He must have been in pain or discomfort that he was not displaying :(
I don't think sweeping statements are meant as a bad thing, it's a good thing when the vet does take into account the breed. Breed can play a massive role in signalling what is wrong or more likely to be wrong and it's good to know the vets are aware of problems that are prevelant in breeds and even general breed characteristics such as high pain tollerance, low pain tollerance, very vocal, not vocal etc. as they all can help in deducing the level of discomfort a dog is actually in.
The vets will unfortunately also see a lot of poorly bred dogs of every breed, the problems your vet mentioned may be rife in the puppy-farm version of your breed :(