
I'm really not sure what I'm arguing about here. But ..... Gestation in the bitch lasts for 62/63 days, usually taken from the first mating much as conception may not have taken place right then. When mine have gone for that length of time, plus a couple of days, then I'd assume any puppies they have need to come out. At that point I take them into the vet for an examination, perhaps x-ray and perhaps a shot to get things moving. Day 56 would clearly not be 'overdue'.
"And you should NEVER give oxytocin unless a pup has been born already." Really? How strange that in many of my litters, oxytocin, or a pit shot, WAS given to get things moving, safely.
"A scan could have prevented both scenarios." And an x-ray, done after the due date - far more accurate than scanning - would have shown this too.
As for not trusting my vet surgery etc....... that's plainly not the point (much as there are very few vets I do fully trust these days!!!). Where I walked my pregnant bitches was out in the country, with a very small dog population anywhere around ...... and when I had puppies, if they went into the vet for vaccination (which wasn't always the case - quite often I had my vet come out to do that in my home) they were contained in a big crate and put on the table on my towel for their vaccination. Minimising risk?
If people want to scan, that's their choice. I just wanted to point out that it's really not necessary!!! ?
But there's no point continuing this really and apologies to the OP for high-jacking their thread.