>we have 6 homes if we did decide to breed (I know these can fall through with change in circumstances etc). we (me and bitch owner) would keep one each, my mum and dad (one each - lives separately -both retired) my BIL and the bitch owners daughter.
I don't understand: If you and the bitch owner would keep a pup, and your mum and dad one each and your brother in law and the bitch owner's daughter - that's 5 people who potentially could have a rescue dog or home a pup from elsewhere. Why do you want to breed more unspectacular pups for no purpose other than to be pets? The UK already has more than enough dogs, desperate for homes - as you'll know if you've rescued them. There are many pups around, from rescue centres or having bounced back to breeders. Why add to that number? Let these people find a dog from elsewhere, if they want one.
Also: It's strange how everyone seems to want a pup before you breed, then you go ahead and breed and suddenly all those 'for sure' people who'd told you they wanted one, melt away and make excuses. Family members are the worst for this. It's very easy to say 'yes. I'd love a pup' - the reality of dealing with toilet training and puppy playbiting and all the rest of it, is quite different.
It is very unusual for a bitch owner to breed to her own stud dog. As a puppy buyer, I would be very suspicious of anyone doing this. Most bitch owners want to *choose* a stud dog to complement their bitch. They have shown or assessed their bitch in various ways and they know her weaknesses. They then choose a stud from lines which complement her, to compensate for these weaknesses. If you're just putting together 2 dogs which you just 'happen' to have, not knowing beforehand how they would turn out - chances are they are not the best matches for each other. To me, it would suggest someone who doesn't understand breeding at all, or who is lazy or saving money (stud fees) by using their own dog. Of course there are exceptions to that - in fact, one of our dogs came from a breeder who owned both sire and dam - but then both were ShChs and had proven themselves and she knew what she was doing.
>I have his pedigree in the attic so if I get 5 mins today I will look it over and see what's there.
You haven't even looked at his pedigree yet, and you're considering breeding your 2 dogs together...??
>I really wanted to understand the qualities a dog needs to be a stud dog, relevant health tests, basically how to go the correct way about it rather than just be another byb.
That is a commendable ideal, but from what you're saying, you're not realising quite what's involved in realising that. I don't own your breed, but if I did, I would be showing my dogs at open shows and champ shows and getting other people's opinions on them. I would be trying to earn them some titles in the ring, and I'd be taking on people's criticisms of them. If they failed to get placed and didn't do well, then I wouldn't breed them. Because there are already a gazillion dogs around - unwanted - all looking for a home. Bringing more mediocre dogs into the world simply wouldn't be something a responsible breeder would do. A responsible breeder breeds for a purpose and a reason: To produce more dogs with specific qualities, whether appearance-based or working/ability based. Your breed isn't one known for working abilities, so you'd be hard pressed to prove yourselves there - although you could have a go, if showing isn't your thing. The important thing is that you should be competing with your dogs and having them assessed by others to know if they are worth breeding from. Otherwise, you are just another byb, in my opinion - no matter how much you might not want to be...
If you ultimately want to breed, instead of asking questions about breeding, you should be asking questions about showing, or agility or competing in some form with your dogs - and how to get into that. Keep breeding as a far off thing for the future.