>Cleo’s statement:
>Surprised you could be bothered to read all of it, i certainly couldn't !!!
>edit : i take it you are talking about the three long posts and not the whole thread?

Is this not a discussion board? Is that not the point? Is this the welcome of all new members? Is this attitude endorsed by the moderators?

Is it not hypocritical of you after making this statement?:
“Ah well, crypt dog, some of us like to explain what point of view we are coming from - rather than making bald, statements that have no resonable facts backing them up. Glad you enjoyed the read though.”

In reply to his:
thank you for your reply cleopatra but you havewrote a novel in reply,lest you have a sexyname

You referred to cleo's statement of:

>>AST are known to be less trustworthy than a pit! <<

and referred to someone being a troll. Now I assume you refer to me due to:

>>>That is a load of B****. Troll??

My all means enlighten me to the facts and your source?

Nemesis, I was I who wrote : a load of b**** and I referred to the initial poster with an APBT. Also, it was I who asked Cleo to tell me where her source was for the statement regarding APBT and AmStaff temperament, not Steve :). Hope this clarifies the matter.

Taylor

-Taylor:
Still not sure which poster you are referring a lot of what has been posted was hogwash.

Thanks indeed for clarifying that it was him you were speaking of and not me as I thought I was getting a hostile response from everyone and it appears it is just cleo and I am still puzzled as to why.