> it is easy to think a totally dislocated hip because part of the pelvis is not there from birth may be easier to deal with than cases where the ball and joint are continually grating on one another.
I agree.
My last dog we got when he was 4 years old. We did not have his medical history, but our vets xrayed him (due to being run over by a car) and found that 1 rear leg was 1&half inches shorter than the other, due to the fact the femoral head had been removed. The leg was effectively held in place with muscle & tissue as the ball-joint was non existant.
He NEVER required any pain meds for that leg. He did always have muscle wastage on the back end, so with old age, he couldn't cope with much excersie from a muscular POV (the leg became weak), but never got pain from it.
He did always look comical when he ran, as the effected leg would almost appear to rotate at the side, bless him, he looked a bit like one of those pull-along ducks whith the flappy feet, but boy could he shift!! (in youth) :)
Back to the question - to operate or not. My 3&half year old dog has elbow displasia (diagnosed at 5 months of age), we have not opperated as the specialist said it's possible to manage via excersie, weight control & suppliments (Buster is on glucosamine & cod liver oil), so we tried that route and, so for (touch wood) an opperation is not on the cards for the forseeable future. Very occasionally he'll get a bit of pain so he'll have Metacam, but in over 2 years, he's only needed it once (for a few days) & that was because he caught his leg undeneath him and fell off the sofa, jarring his elbow on landing.
I think you need to get a specialists opinion, as how you can manage the problem without an opperation will depend on what exactly is going on.
Best of luck, these things are such a worry :(