> When we put our deposit down on the puppy we informed the breeders that breeding is definitely an avenue we will give some consideration to. We do not want her as a show dog, she will just simply be a member of the family.
>
If you have no intention of showing or working your bitch you really should not be thinking of breeding.
Breeding should be about wishing to produce typical pups as part of a desire to propagate the breeds traits for show and/or work.
If you do neither you can have no idea whether the bitch is up to scratch or have any way of researching studs that will suit your bitch. You need to see lots of them, what they have produced, and have the knowledge to assess this before going on to produce future generations.
This is called responsible breeding. Simply breeding for no good reason is not when you consider how many dogs are abandoned each year. A breeder needs to be knowledgeable about their breed so they can guide new owners, and also be there at any point in their lives if they need re-homing.
Can you make such a huge commitment for up to 16 years after a litter is bred, if you can't then you risk adding to the already huge rescue problem.
A good breeder would have explained the above to you, and certainly would nto be offering you a puppy with a fault if getting deeper into the breed is your aim. No good breeder would sell a bitch pup simply to be bred from without any showing or working, most good breeders put the restriction "progeny not eligible for registration" on pups they sell,a dn these are only removed once health tests are passed and the dog/bitch has shown itself a worthy specimen to be bred from.
If your breeder does not show, this just goes to show how such breeding allows various departures from the standard to creep in, when people breed without the knowledge to select properly, or what to do when an undesirable trait is produced.