Not logged inChampdogs Information Exchange
Forum Breeders Help Search Board Index Active Topics Login

Find your perfect puppy at Champdogs
The UK's leading pedigree dog breeder website for over 25 years

Topic Dog Boards / Health / minimal spaying of bitch.
- By spiritulist [in] Date 07.08.07 19:17 UTC
Our Dobe bitch is due her spay op, but her Daddy(sweetheart) is worried sick. He has been putting it off for her last 2 seasons, even though we have no intention to breed. He seems to find a valid reason to say, "no not this time." every time.

Tonight though, he was very, very brave and he spoke to our vet:eek: She has tried her best to reasure him and has told us that they'll look at Rowans uterus first and if it's healthy, she'll only remove the ovaries and leave the uterus in situ, therefore lessening the major in what is, a major op. Intrestingly enough, she's also said that this course of action lessens the chances of Rowan becoming incontinent after the spay or in later life.

Has any of the Champogs ever heard of this op before, because I havn't? 
- By Isabel Date 07.08.07 19:24 UTC
No, and I really can't quite see the point.  The minimal extra risk of tying off and removing the uterus seems well worth the removal of all chance of pyometra or endometrial cancer.  Can't really understood why it would lessen the chance of incontinence as I understand this was hormone led which, of course is dicatated to by the ovaries and not the uterus although I could be wrong and perhaps it is a positional thing although, as in humans, I imagined the horns of the uterus would be quite small when not pregnant.  Also if you are so unfortunate as to induce incontinence this can be well controlled with drugs.
- By munrogirl76 Date 07.08.07 20:52 UTC
No, it sounds very odd. :confused: I think in humans they remove the UTERUS and leave the ovaries for hormonal benefits. But since spay incontinence is meant to be hormonally driven I would have thought it would not make any difference if the uterus is left in as the ovaries are what produces the hormone.
- By perrodeagua [gb] Date 07.08.07 22:11 UTC
Actually in humans they don't always remove the whole lot, my mum had cancer a number of years ago and they didn't do a full hysterectomy.  Although she's had a number of scares over the years, touch wood, it has never returned.
- By Isabel Date 07.08.07 22:23 UTC
I think they are far more likely to leave ovaries when removing a uterus than the other way round as there is so little point to it but it's different in humans anyway because we are never having them removed purely for neutering purposes :)
- By Ktee [au] Date 07.08.07 23:44 UTC
I think it's a silly idea.i would just get her in and get the whole thing over with :) I hate half jobs :D
- By Jeangenie [gb] Date 08.08.07 07:26 UTC
Leaving the uterus still leaves her susceptible to pyometritis.
- By Brainless [gb] Date 08.08.07 09:14 UTC
For me the main reason for spaying my adult bitches is to prevent Pyo in later life when it might be more hazardous to their survival to have to do an emergency spay on an older sick bitch.
- By tohme Date 09.08.07 15:53 UTC
When is an egg not an egg.

A hysterectomy is different from an oopherectomy.  Not all women have the same op for differing reasons. Cannot see why I would not remove the uterus from a dog myself.
Topic Dog Boards / Health / minimal spaying of bitch.

Powered by mwForum 2.29.6 © 1999-2015 Markus Wichitill

About Us - Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy