
Yes it is very normal in the USA. People in the USA I know who ahve visited our shows wish their shows were more like ours where it is primarily breeders and owners handling for the enjoyment.
They also wish that judges had to do critiques as these are simply never done, so a judge never has to justify their decision. The vast majority of judging is done by non specialists, which may account for why the top winners in all breeds have more in common with each other and a generic showdog than necesarily their breed type.

There are lots of good dogs of all breeds, but many of the top dogs are very exagerated, or presented in an exagerated fashion to win.
Maybe that would account for why the presenter at Crufts Wayne Cavanaugh has twice needed to comment on the Group winning Elkhounds not being a glamorous breed, I should hope not, neither is a Labrador or any number of breeds. Surely dog shows are about finding the exhibit that most closely meets it's breed standard and all the breed traits, and not the most glamorous dog.
Certainly in my own breed they consider a dog of the desired height too small for Groups, prefering an oversized overangulated overdone in head flashy animal.