
That's the theory Patty, but as one owner found to her cost it isn't always the case
The main thing to remember is that a microchip in the eyes of the Law in England, Wales & N. Ireland is
not a permanent mark & therefore is
not proof of ownership of whatever it is implanted in.
In most cases it does result in the return of property but not always & there have been cases were a dog's microchip was registered in joint names & the chip company refused to divulge the whereabouts to half of the partnership & even though they had had contact from half of the owners, still transferred the ownership to a rescue who then destroyed the dog

:rolleyes: In this case they did transfer the registration of the chip(not the ownership of the dog BTW)
They quoted the data protection act to one of the owners(load of cr*p)when they refused to tell them where the dog was because both the owners had not contacted them ! They only tried ringing the registered owners they did not write to them by signed for delivery not try any other form of contact
Add to this the instructions from the BVA that if an animal, is scanned by anyone at a vets other than a vet the registered owners of the chip are
not informed

:rolleyes: Glad to say for the animals sakes this is usually ignored !
Until the law is changed having your dog chipped is not a proof of your ownership of the dog