Not logged inChampdogs Information Exchange
By CAZZA
Date 25.01.04 22:14 UTC
Hi
Ive tried doing a search and cant seem to find much difference between these 2 foods. Anyone have any experience of them, or know any info?
I also noticed Arden Grange too in my search. Im on a reasonably cheap complete dry food at mo. and wonder whether its worth a change, they are ok on it, but just ok!! Hence the search!
By staffmad5
Date 26.01.04 00:48 UTC
gain 28
By staffmad5
Date 26.01.04 00:54 UTC
sorry' gain 28 complete. I find works really well with my dogs and very reasonably priced
good luck with your search
By Jackie H
Date 26.01.04 07:18 UTC
Have used Arden Grange and got good results but one of my hounds had a itchy skin so I tried Burns, they are all doing very well, itch gone and I am very happy with it. There is no sign of cereal in the stools so I believe that the Burns grain content is only rice which the dogs seem to be able to digest.
By tohme
Date 26.01.04 10:27 UTC
You will find that the main difference between the two is that unlike Burns which, in most varieties IS just meat, rice and veggies, JWB has numerous other ingredients too. They advertise it as just Turkey/Lam/Duck and rice/oats etc but if you look at their website and the ingredients you will find that is not the case!
The best food for your dogs is one that they do well on and contains only NUTRITION rather than fillers etc and avoids sugars, salts, soya, and colours etc. In fact just like us :D
By JayneA
Date 26.01.04 11:01 UTC
I agree. We've 'trialed' both both with Os and were much happier with the Burns - JMO!
Jayne
Powered by mwForum 2.29.6 © 1999-2015 Markus Wichitill