When I look on the selling sites there are lots of French Bulldogs and Boston terriers in colours which the breed standard exclude. Can they still be KC registered? Louise
Years ago now, I had a go at the KC because they were registering Basset puppies with a load of colours that weren't 'any recognised hound colour'. It's been better of late however. But any recognised hound colour is rather ambiguous, even if 'hound people' know what that should mean!
None standard colours are registered as: "Colour Not Recognised By KC"
However, from time to time The KC will also list a colour along the lines of 'Sable - Not KC recognised' Example here. Not 100% sure but we think it may be because 'sable' was used in the past and before the KC updated their 'acceptable colours'.
Rough and smooth collie and shelties are described as sable and white, but the main part of the dog is sable, with white bits such as feet, collar etc.
Well how did all these colours originate? Yet still fulfilling the KC registration requirements. There must have been outcrosses to get them I suppose. Perhaps from abroad where standards are less rigorous.
Two ways, some were in the breed all along but just considered a fault and as such unpopular but popped up from time to time. Then others were never recorded in the breed before suddenly appearing. These new coloirs often are imported from certain eastern European countires. They likley came about from a cross breeding and lieing to get them registered. You also see the same now with long coat.