> All generations in her pedigree have clear eye tests
Unfortunately if there is no DNA test, a clinical test will only tell you that the dog is not affected, and for non congenital conditions, unaffected at time of testing.
Take my own dogs for example.
We always knew that there were sporadic cases of Glacuoma in the breed, but no clear pattern, and we were actually taken off Schedule 3 (under investigation). to date I have not produced an affected dog in 7 generations.
Yet when the gene and mode of inheritance were identified last year at Helsinki university. My oldest was found to be a carrier, her daughter clear, then her two daughters both carriers (so the dogs I used must be carriers), then their two daughters both Clear, and now with DNA testing of both parents my young pup is Hereditary Clear for all five breed relevant conditions (one of which we didn't even know until May that we had in the breed).
When prcd-PRA was identified in 2008 I was lucky to have all clear, but pure luck as sire of eldest turned out to be a deceased carrier (discovered due to a carrier offspring from a clear dam).
> should the sire still be a stud??
If there isn't a DNA test for the condition, then no she should cease being used as he is a known carrier.
if there is a DNA test then he should only be used on DNA tested clear dams, if his use is seen as desirable, but better to use a clear son of equal quality.