
Haven't had time to read it thoroughly, but thanks for posting, interesting article and I will get round to reading it more thoroughly later on.
Is it only me that thinks there's a difference between breeding towards a healthy animal, and breeding to end genetic defects? I've said this before, on other forums and threads, I don't think the priority of breeding should be to breed a genetically clear animal, for conditions where we know we can breed pups that won't be affected ie develop the genetic condition. So why do people bang on about genetically clear dogs, when there are probably hundreds of genetic conditions we don't, and won't ever test for?? Or is it just me, answers on a postcard cos I've got to dash off and do chores.......
PS bet my comment's easy to spot, lol!