Yep, wonderful place for a debate here on this forum :D :D :D
Ok here goes: :rolleyes:
Bloat kills overnight...so would people really take their dog to a vet the day after their dog died back in the days?

Vets weren't really that respected or worshiped by many country people. When animals died, it was accepted part of life, buried the animal, felt sad, and went on with life.
(remember, 50 yrs ago, small animal care was considered a luxury, still is in many parts of the world). My mom and her horsey people are still more likely to treat their own horses with experience and one another than to consult an "expensive fancy dr. having a piece of paper" :)
Despite working at a vet for three years + considerable experiences with dogs over the decades, I have yet to actually meet anyone (other than on here and by reading articles) whose dogs died from or experienced bloat. I've met people who "know of someone, who knew someone's else dog...", but if it were truly that epidemic like many make it out to be, wouldn't it be more prevalant in US and UK society?

Not saying that I'm the center of the universe ;) ;) , but I have lived in WA, NM, Wash. DC, Maryland, Korea, Germany and making contact from dog people all over the world. Surely if it's so widespread, I could have at least met someone with firsthand knowledge of it???? :rolleyes: I know that certain breeds do have a "higher incidence and tendency towards" bloat....again, vast majority are large and giant dogs.
I'm not wanting to minimize Bloat's deadliness, just trying to put it in perspective with other "health risks" to worry about.
:(
In my thinking, I just cannot blame the increase of bloat on dogfood companies make, otherwise it would affect all breeds of varied sizes, not just some and within specific genetic lines.

I am more likely to believe the rise of dog problems in our society is due to the increasing numbers of pet owners, the variety of life styles/attitudes of training and care, + rise in population density esp. within suburbs and country life.
Whew! that was a runon sentence, ay?
:P
Health care has become more important to pet owners on the whole. We take them in for regular vet checkups and actually provide PET INSURANCE!!! :rolleyes: me grampy is rolling in his grave :) Life has really changed in the way us Westerners keep our dogs. Less households believe that a dog is to be kept permanently out in the yard (which was common 30 years ago). I remember an old lady being absolutely shocked when she discovered that my dogs were allowed in the living room. I didn't have the heart to tell her they ate in the kitchen

:D :D :D
To get back on topic, though to determine if dogs are true carnivores or omnivores. It might be a good idea to think about cats...which are acknowledged carnivores. If you hand a cat a piece of fruit, it might lick it, but on average (there are always exceptions :)), wouldn't it just ignore it? Whereas a dog will likely eat it and successfully digest it. (again, exceptions :))
I'm not certain if those who are feeding the meat, veggies, and fruits are following BARF diet or not, but if they are, then their dogs are omnivorous. If the dog is being considered as carnivorous, then meat is the only thing that one is providing for the dog and it is happy with just that to eat. It would ignore any other type of food provided, unless it was starving. Then it would eat, only to survive and wait for food on the hoof to come along :) :D :D
jmho