
The Kennel club have decided, with mixed reactions from breed clubs, to draw attention to breeds of UK origin that have registration figures under 300 as being endangered.
I own a well established breed that is not British, but has been in the UK since the 1870's.
The peak in registrations in about 1969/1970 was just short of 300 a year.
Registrations have fallen steadily to around 150 when I came into the breed about 16 years ago, and have fallen steadily since being under 100 in the last two years.
Ever since our breed rescue was established in the 1970's because a few had gotten into commercial hands the breed club have been very wary of any promoting of the breed. We have a steady disproportionate rescue problem caused primarily by BYB bred litters, mostly sold through a Northern Pet store, so their position can be understood, but the decreasing breeding by good breeders is not reducing the rescue numbers (could be argued the reverse in fact).
On the other hand we have breeders struggling to breed with the small gene pool caused by the small number of enthusiasts in the breed, and expensive imports have to be made regularly and the consequent variance in type that results takes time to be ironed out, and then back to needing more new blood.
There are many breeds In a similar position, not just newly introduced breeds but those of long standing.
Many of these numerically small breeds produce quality dogs if you take their disproportionate success in the group rings..
Now I know that some breeds will always have a limited following being very much for the specialist, but some breeds like my own are not as hard to own as some newer and over popularised breeds with similar looks (I can think of three breeds mine are mistaken for), and sadly these have now got huge rescue problems.
So how do you think breeds can be promoted without being prey to exploitation?.