>Dont most people ask, can I see mum and dad (if available) do they have any health problems?
Maybe they do - and maybe they're lied to? HOW is Joe or Jill Public meant to know if someone like the lady with the Cavalier, who is clearly hugely successful in the show ring and probably has a house full of trophies and rosettes, tells them that there is no problem? I think it's easy for us to forget that very many people still have no access to the internet, and indeed no idea what myriad information it holds.
(I'm not sure we were told how long ago the lady who was campaigning for action on Syringomyelia had bought her Cavaliers, and I'm not sure how long knowledge of the condition has been available? Maybe she went to a breeder for the second one and asked all the right questions, but was not given correct or knowledgeable answers?)
I actually have no problem with the dog being shown and having won BIS - in fact, maybe it would be quite a good thing and raise awareness if people saw him, admired him and asked to use him at stud but were told that due to this horrible condition he was not available.
It was, of course, an
extremely unbalanced programme - various of the knowledgeable people could have given very good responses and arguments to some of the questions, and it all have been edited out. No coverage of the breeds which have very few problems. However, don't think anyone could argue that they raised some extremely valid points and that some of the breeders interviewed gave a very poor impression. Some of it, like the culling of ridgeless Ridgebacks, comes down to a stockman's view and it has been long debated on here by people who may agree or disagree with it - but some just seemed very callous. My particular favourite was Pugs that faint, "but they're fine afterwards".
To add to my 'Puppy Prices' post of last week ... oh dear, to those who have unbooked puppies now.
M.