Chez_swa
>He said that the bleed behind the eye was caused by the head collar. How could he possibly know that? He was assuming cause and effect through association. The bleed could have been caused by a number of things.<
Denis
You are quite right he could not 'know' that, even if he saw a vet the vet could only do the same as the owner, which was to deduce from the situation as a whole, try and remember that that about 99.099% of the things we do we do it from deduction and not scientific fact, but halter types, all types are notorious for many things, one of them is rubbing around the eye, that area has thin skin and is highly sensitive compared to other facial tissue.
You can find out for yourself now attention has been drawn to it, count how many dogs you see with a halter type on it has the strap close to the eye of the side where the dog is kept to heel, then think how many small but frequent little jerks that dog might get from the strap for each hour worn and start 'thinking' in those terms. Apart from that I will PM you a link from someone who is far more an expert on halters, I would never use one, never have and never would.
Chez_swa
>Tell me how keeping a dog from pulling on a lead with a normal collar is less strenuous than pulling on a head collar? <
Denis
I can tell you that more study has been done in this area than what I am aware of with halters, this suggests, and I am convinced, that as much damage is done by a dog pulling on the lead than as is done by halters, probably because more dogs are on collars and leads than dogs on halters, see Hallgren below, I have a copy of his studies here which I got from Anders Hallgren in 2002.
You are missing the point I think, you are doing very little except punishing the dog all the time and you should certainly ask your trainer when is the dog going to respond to whatever it is you are supposed to be being taught, anyway, I have sent a PM with the halter observations on and below is the massive 91% findings of damage to dogs caused by pulling on a lead.
One question to you, I have answered yours to a reasonable degree. Why is it that I have to point things out when you are going to some kind of training class, your trainer should have put all these things under your hat long ago,first lesson, if not then someone here should have told you - I suggest you ask when the rewards can begin as things are...huh .... anyway - blessings.
Anders Hallgren -Back problems in dogs 1991.
P1 - P6.
P1.
In 1991 I studied in an attempt to map frequency of back injuries in dogs. The study comprised 400 dogs and a team of chiropractors.
EDIT.
P3.
There seems to be a connection between how the collar is handled and back problems. Pulling and jerking on the leash affect especially the neck and throat.
EDIT
However, one of the clearest correlation's in the whole study was between cervical (neck) damages and 'jerk and pull'. 91% of the dogs who had neck injuries had also been exposed to jerking and pulling on the lead by the owner or had been allowed to pull hard on the leash for long periods of time.
Authors note: - A very low percentage of the dogs that had no cervical injuries had been exposed to jerking or allowed to pull for long periods.
EDIT.
P 4
Dogs of different breeds represented by 9 or more dogs of that breed were listed to see if some breeds were more inclined to back problems. Other dogs were involved.
1. Bernese Mountain dog 2. Mixed breeds 3. Boxer. 4. Cavalier King Charles. 5. Collie 6. Dobermann 7. Flat Coated Retriever 8. Golden Retriever 9. Groenendal 10. Lab Retriever 11. GSD 12. Tervueren.
Back defects as irritation
It's well known that dogs with different diseases easily develop problem behaviours,
pain and consequent aggression etc.